Author Topic: [closed] APOLOGY IN PUBLIC CLICK HERE EVERYONE (Read 11158 times)

hfbldprince · Reply #25 - 14 April 2007, 14:36:59

"Sorry I don't buy that one second. Also the post with the link took place at 17:30
today and your "friend" was still answering my posts in real time at about 20:00 ?
you take very long shower it seem !?? (same IP than your computer, "she" was at your home)"

Yes but i was there when she did that. She doesnt have internet; so i (without charge, of course) gave her a copy of
orbiter 2006 on a CD for her to put onto her computer. Then she wanted to see the forums, so i said, "fine, but i g2g
to
the bathroom really bad, so when i went she did that.

DanSteph · Reply #26 - 14 April 2007, 14:57:39

crap and again crap... good bye, you had three chances it seem it was too much for you.

Profile discarded and guy banned from this site.

Dan

Message modifié ( 14-04-2007 15:34 )

kipper · Reply #27 - 14 April 2007, 16:07:51

I am 40 years of age I don't really need to see this kind of kiddie thing in my leisure time. Goodbye and good riddance to him.

scinrd · Reply #28 - 14 April 2007, 17:41:38

change my mind, he really was a scumbag, probably deserved harsher than what he got

DanSteph · Reply #29 - 14 April 2007, 17:58:54

To complete the story he's now insulting me by mail

Pathetic...

Dan

Heywood · Reply #30 - 14 April 2007, 19:23:08

Incredible story... 8o
Dan, you´re the better.

Heywood

jgrillo2002 · Reply #31 - 14 April 2007, 23:34:19

jeez. does he ever get this stupid. no offense taken

Joe_BAR · Reply #32 - 14 April 2007, 23:53:10

How the hell people can be so stupid ???... I'm still stunned...!!!!

Don't bother a fucking minute with that chicken crazy damn stupid fool...

I think he burned himself during manual reentry...

MattNW · Reply #33 - 15 April 2007, 05:13:39

In my opinion this guy's antics and demeanor seem more like a 13 year old kid and that insults some of the more responsible
13 year olds I know.

I'm with Dan. It isn't so much that he released the beta. The DGIII was a public beta all through development. It's more a
matter of trust and doing the job you agreed to do when you signed up. If it weren't for people like hlfbldprnc this beta
would likely be public still.

DanSteph · Reply #34 - 15 April 2007, 05:15:07

Quote

MattNW a écrit:
It isn't so much that he released the beta. The DGIII was a public beta all through development. It's more a
matter of trust and doing the job you agreed to do when you signed up. If it weren't for people like hlfbldprnc this beta would likely be public still..

Exact and exact...

Dan

Message modifié ( 15-04-2007 05:16 )

R Groszewski · Reply #35 - 17 April 2007, 03:59:24

I think we should post his IP online, let him get hacked for what he did. You got to hit him where it hurts.... Either the
crotch or his credit card number.

DanSteph · Reply #36 - 17 April 2007, 04:02:27

dynamic IP

Dan

jer11 · Reply #37 - 17 April 2007, 05:00:49

im with dan with his "Dynamic IP"

sunshine135 · Reply #38 - 17 April 2007, 18:34:11

Quote

jer11 wrote:
im with dan with his "Dynamic IP"

I think what Dan was saying is that he could not give out his IP address because it was dynamic (i.e. given out to his
gateway or modem by his ISP) versus a static address. In that case, he could receive multiple addresses over time, so which
address would you hit? You could end up slamming someone innocent to all of this. Then we would be no better than he is.

DanSteph · Reply #39 - 17 April 2007, 19:52:32

I close this thread, no need to see it resurected every two days

Dan