0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
MattNW wrote:QuoteAlrik wrote:Hi allIve got some ideas for the DGIII:Something that the evas could repair could be good. Some circuits in the wings or something like that.Obiously with the first idea you should need a Randomic Failure system that manage the first.A lot of things could be done, for example when the evas moves in the earth or a planet or moon could move their legs, or do a little jumps to move. That is no imposible, and I think that could do that the moving with eva be better.The first one is hard to do because of a limitation in Orbiter. If you move too close (still too far away to be trying to fix anything) to the ship then you kind of see right through the ship mesh. Not much that can be done about that without a change in the way Orbiter renders meshes.
Alrik wrote:Hi allIve got some ideas for the DGIII:Something that the evas could repair could be good. Some circuits in the wings or something like that.Obiously with the first idea you should need a Randomic Failure system that manage the first.A lot of things could be done, for example when the evas moves in the earth or a planet or moon could move their legs, or do a little jumps to move. That is no imposible, and I think that could do that the moving with eva be better.
True! To be honest I just like the idea of a failure that requires greater care during re-entry, and the overheatingfuel tanks were the only one I could think of that would be relatively easy to implement (My reasoning being thatconformal tanks don't need alterations to the current DG mesh, and that the re-entry display already showstemperatures so much of the code would already be implemented).Perhaps one excuse:The tanks are made from ultra-lightweight materials and are only intended to withstand ascent and the temperaturesresulting from exposure to sunlight, hencea) at high temperatures the tank itself, along with the trace amounts of fuel, may disintegrate with potentialdamage to the DG's hull (though this seems a bit of a feeble excuse for a fatal failure!)orb) The tanks contain small thrusters - intended to controllably de-orbit an empty tank from at least LEO - and justenough propellant to do catastrophic damage to the DG's main tanks if overheated...It'd be great if someone can think of a more logical excuse!
canadave wrote:What the heck, since Dan's just sitting there giggling to himself ("Those fools, the DG4 is years away at the very least").....I want to see Windows XP in the MFD screens There, that oughta hold you for a while!
canadave wrote:I can't believe no one's asked for a cocktail waitress yet. Fully anatomically correct model, too, please...none of that 2D stuff What the heck, since Dan's just sitting there giggling to himself ("Those fools, the DG4 is years away at the very least").....I want to see Windows XP in the MFD screens There, that oughta hold you for a while!
MadMike wrote:What makes you guys think there will be another DG by DanI hear hes very busy these days counting money
DanSteph wrote:QuoteMadMike wrote:What makes you guys think there will be another DG by DanI hear hes very busy these days counting moneyYou mean that after giving you thousand hours of work for free for your enjoyement it's still not enough and that I don't deserve now to earn money from my work so my familly can live ?I feel your message really insulting and unfair...Dan